[GHC] #11149: Unify fixity/associativity of <>-ish pretty-printing operators
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Mon Nov 30 15:02:03 UTC 2015
#11149: Unify fixity/associativity of <>-ish pretty-printing operators
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: hvr | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.0.1
Component: Compiler | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by hvr:
Old description:
> Throughout GHC's source there are related pretty-printing operators with
> subtly different `infixr/infixl`-declarations.
>
> It would be desirable to unify those and possibly use `Semigroup((<>))`
> instead (where `<>` represents a semigroup/monoid operation anyway)
>
> Otoh, existing code using `<>` assumes a different fixity, so it may make
> sense to start by renaming the unconventional `<>`s into something else.
New description:
This ticket is motivated by GHC's new `-fwarn-semigroup`, and that `<>` is
moving into `Prelude` with future GHCs.
Throughout GHC's source there are related pretty-printing operators with
subtly different `infixr/infixl`-declarations.
It would be desirable to unify those and possibly use `Semigroup((<>))`
instead (where `<>` represents a semigroup/monoid operation anyway)
Otoh, existing code using `<>` assumes a different fixity, so it may make
sense to start by renaming the unconventional `<>`s into something else.
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11149#comment:2>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list