[GHC] #11149: Unify fixity/associativity of <>-ish pretty-printing operators

[GHC]

#11149: Unify fixity/associativity of <>-ish pretty-printing operators
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
        Reporter:  hvr               |                Owner:
            Type:  task              |               Status:  new
        Priority:  normal            |            Milestone:  8.0.1
       Component:  Compiler          |              Version:
      Resolution:                    |             Keywords:
Operating System:  Unknown/Multiple  |         Architecture:
                                     |  Unknown/Multiple
 Type of failure:  None/Unknown      |            Test Case:
      Blocked By:                    |             Blocking:
 Related Tickets:                    |  Differential Rev(s):
       Wiki Page:                    |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by hvr:

Old description:

> Throughout GHC's source there are related pretty-printing operators with
> subtly different `infixr/infixl`-declarations.
>
> It would be desirable to unify those and possibly use `Semigroup((<>))`
> instead (where `<>` represents a semigroup/monoid operation anyway)

New description:

 Throughout GHC's source there are related pretty-printing operators with
 subtly different `infixr/infixl`-declarations.

 It would be desirable to unify those and possibly use `Semigroup((<>))`
 instead (where `<>` represents a semigroup/monoid operation anyway)

 Otoh, existing code using `<>` assumes a different fixity, so it may make
 sense to start by renaming the unconventional `<>`s into something else.

--

--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11149#comment:1>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler