[ghc-steering-committee] Please review #517: Require implementors before proposal submission, Shepherd: Simon PJ

[Spiwack, Arnaud]

I haven't been convinced yet. As I said in my previous email, I'm a priori
against this proposal. But this is a gut feeling. More importantly than
that, I don't feel that we have documented how other communities handle
this. I also don't feel that the number of unimplemented proposals is so
high as to be a problem.

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 7:42 PM Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> also in light of the discussion at Haskell Symposium, can we proceed
> with this (or drop this)? Arnaud was most vocally in the “against”
> camp; are you still against it?
>
> NB: Opening PRs and discussing them with the general public is welcome
> even before implementors have been found, and committee members can of
> course join that discussion. Only the formal committee submission would
> be blocked until implementors have been found.
>
> Cheers,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de
>   http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20220920/d4bc601f/attachment.html>