[ghc-steering-committee] GHC 2020

Simon Peyton Jones simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Oct 27 10:29:19 UTC 2020


|  If no discussion arises, I’ll formally submit this soon. 

Sounds fine to me.  Thank Joachim.

Simon

|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee-
|  bounces at haskell.org> On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner
|  Sent: 26 October 2020 15:37
|  To: ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
|  Subject: Re: [ghc-steering-committee] GHC 2020
|  
|  Hi,
|  
|  Am Montag, den 19.10.2020, 15:40 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
|  > Hi,
|  >
|  > >    The reason I'm willing is because I believe that the community
|  really
|  > >    wants it -- but I'd love to have evidence for that belief. This
|  > >    discussion is taking place on the GHC committee mailing list to
|  which
|  > >    the community more broadly can't easily contribute. I'd love to
|  ask
|  > >    them more explicitly, or even take a poll.
|  >
|  > Well, let’s see :-)
|  >
|  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
|  reddit.com%2Fr%2Fhaskell%2Fcomments%2Fje1t82%2Fdoes_the_idea_of_xghc20
|  21_excite_you%2F&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccae6b47b
|  af714d1a496808d879c50d45%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C
|  637393234538994698%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjo
|  iV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VWt1s7T8wi3mB
|  mGLrOASPgOcQUhu003uPI9Juet0aTc%3D&reserved=0
|  
|  a week later, we have
|  
|  862 votes
|  655 76.0% 🤩 Oh yes yes, please! I’m so eager to use that!
|  127 14.7% 🙂 Sounds good I guess? I won’t use it myself, but still a
|  good idea.
|  65   7.5% 🤷 Shrug, I woudn’t care.
|  15   1.7% 🤮 Please no, this is a horrible idea!
|  
|  I think that counts as a community mandate.
|  
|  
|  Do any of you want to weigh in more on the formulation of criteria and
|  process at
|  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
|  ub.com%2Fghc-proposals%2Fghc-
|  proposals%2Fpull%2F372&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cca
|  e6b47baf714d1a496808d879c50d45%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%
|  7C0%7C637393234538994698%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiL
|  CJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=SvTGu1w
|  l%2BC8OiwXEq0YrSZM8hjTxCq79obE%2FN73mBSo%3D&reserved=0?
|  
|  Note in particular this line – that was the idea, wasn't it?
|  
|     When ghc is used without an explicit language choice, the latest
|     GHC20xx known to GHC is used. This applies in particular to uses of
|     ghci.
|  
|  
|  If no discussion arises, I’ll formally submit this soon. Is the usual
|  “looks like nobody complains so we have consensus” enough, or do we
|  want a proper vote on this? Note that this doesn't really set anything
|  in stone, and we can fine-tune the process as we go.
|  
|  Cheers,
|  Joachim
|  
|  --
|  Joachim Breitner
|    mail at joachim-breitner.de
|  
|  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.j
|  oachim-
|  breitner.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccae6b47baf
|  714d1a496808d879c50d45%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C63
|  7393234538994698%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV
|  2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BPpXK%2F0rHIbhj
|  t0xta2Ptjoc9t6fGWHhoopy0qQxqPU%3D&reserved=0
|  
|  
|  _______________________________________________
|  ghc-steering-committee mailing list
|  ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
|  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail
|  .haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering-
|  committee&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccae6b47baf714d1
|  a496808d879c50d45%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6373932
|  34539004692%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMz
|  IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VOBV5UDa1qqQN%2BtZgj
|  ZfnsfO%2FLX42ij1AW09DpCqs0o%3D&reserved=0


More information about the ghc-steering-committee mailing list