[ghc-steering-committee] #195 recommendation: accept

[Spiwack, Arnaud]

> I don’t think we should formally accept proposals that are ill-specified,
> in the hope that they’ll subsequently be fixed up.  Pushing back to “please
> revise to address these points” is not a negative thing – it’s a positive
> thing, saying good proposal but let’s make it better.
>
>
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering-committee&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C527240705f664101bba108d76295dabb%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637086268899189882&sdata=RB0VvVusRaa2rws1UZzuIg4TlM2gv42zPia3oNOO4T8%3D&reserved=0>
>
> For the record: I didn't imply otherwise (I was merely registering my
acceptance provided details are filled out to the rest of the committee's
satisfaction). I'm rather curious of what made my email sound like I was
suggesting immediate acceptance, but I really don't want to derail this
thread.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20191106/b5eb7673/attachment.html>