[ghc-steering-committee] Deprecating Exports (#134); Recommendation: accept

Joachim Breitner mail at joachim-breitner.de
Thu May 24 17:35:47 UTC 2018


Hi,

in fact, GHC knows how something is imported; it uses this information to report redundant imports. So I can optimistically hope that the implementation effort is reasonable.

Cheers,
Joachim


Am 24. Mai 2018 19:04:45 MESZ schrieb Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com>:
>I have a bunch of question about this proposal, but I wrote them on the
>proposal discussion page, as this is what folks asked for, last time I
>had
>some questions.   I think answering them would make the proposal more
>clear.
>
>It seems to me that the use of this extension is somewhat limited, but
>it
>could be useful on occasion so I could take it or leave it.    It's
>been a
>while since I've looked at the GHC source, but I don't think that
>implementing this would be completely trivial, as I don't thing GHC
>currently cares about *how* names came to in scope, just what they
>refer
>to.   But, I believe this is usually not a big factor in our
>discussions,
>just though I'd mention it.
>
>-Iavor
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:23 AM Joachim Breitner
><mail at joachim-breitner.de>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> alanasp has proposed a Deprecating Exports mechanism:
>>
>>
>https://github.com/alanasp/ghc-proposals/blob/patch-2/proposals/deprecating_exports_proposal.rst
>>
>> The gist is explained by this:
>>
>>    module Data.List
>>    (  ...
>>        {-# DEPRECATE lines "Exported from Data.String instead" #-}
>>        , lines
>>        ...t
>>    ) where
>>
>> i.e. DEPRECATE pragmas in export lists cause warning when some other
>> module uses the deprecated symbol when it is imported (only) via some
>> deprecated export.
>>
>> This is a GSOC 2018 project, mentored by Matthew Pickering and Erik
>de
>> Castro Lopo.
>>
>> The feature has a clear use-case, is self-contained and David Feuer
>> (the containers maintainer) has already confirmed that there is a
>real
>> demand for this. I suggest acceptance!
>>
>>
>> As always, I will understand silence as tactic consensus.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Joachim
>>
>>
>> --
>> Joachim Breitner
>>   mail at joachim-breitner.de
>>   http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>> _______________________________________________
>> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
>> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
>>
>https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>>


More information about the ghc-steering-committee mailing list