[ghc-steering-committee] What should we start with?

[Christopher Allen]

What's the most ready for discussion or implementation in your estimation?

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Joachim Breitner
<mail at joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> good to have a mailing list, thanks to whoever set it up.
>
> I would like to see us warming up by handling a first proposal before
> all of us forget that we are on this committee. Which should we get
> started on?
>
> There are two that have the “Pending review” label: Levity Polymorphism
> and OverloadedRecordFields
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/labels/Pending%20committee%20review
> According to our process documents, this label setting should have
> already triggered our part of the process!
>
> We could also look for proposals that have not been updated in a while
> (you can sort by that in the issue list) for example
> * Optional tuple parenthesization <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/19>
> * Stack pointer stuff <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/17>
> and others.
> I pinged a few random old proposals and asked them to maybe move
> forward (or abandon).
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>   XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
>   Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>



-- 
Chris Allen
Currently working on http://haskellbook.com