Buy-in for technical proposal 47 which affect GHC devs

[Ben Gamari]

Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com> writes:

> Would this include making those modules not hidden in ghc base? There’s
> been a few times where that status made it quite hard to build
> documentation for those modules!
>
What do you mean concretely? In most cases modules would remain exposed
(that is, importable). However, I doubt there will be any change in
their Haddock status (e.g. not-home or hidden).

Cheers,

- Ben

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 905 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20230321/42e10a77/attachment.sig>