GHC and the future of Freenode

[Mario Carneiro]

Speaking as a *heavy* user of the Rust and Lean zulip instances, I find it
a huge improvement over the alternatives of Gitter and Discord, and I think
IRC although I have not used IRC much. It takes some getting used to, but
the topic threading is absolutely essential once you reach a certain size.
Looking at other chat platforms, overlapping conversations are a major
problem when you have more than around 10 people online at once. Rust
routinely has 50 or more online at once, and channels help but even then
you will have multiple topics in a single channel, and that extra level of
organization is absolutely warranted. It also helps when you want to look
back at the discussion (or even just find it again!) or continue an old
conversation from a year ago. Most of these activities I couldn't even
imagine doing in a Gitter/Discord style chat platform.

I have no stake in this discussion, but I thought I should balance out the
Zulip downvotes with some positive experiences. (Also, I would definitely
be more likely to participate on a haskell Zulip than an IRC or Matrix
instance, FWIW.)

Mario Carneiro

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:58 PM Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I definitely find Zulip confusing and have failed to use it every time
> I’ve tried
>
> If normal threading is lasagna layers, Zulip threading is like trying to
> hold cooked spaghetti in your ha d.
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:40 PM Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> (I'm a little ashamed that I lurk on this list but the thing that brings
>> me out of lurking is a post on communication technologies)
>>
>> Not Zulip.
>>
>> Please not Zulip.
>>
>> I've used Zulip once many years ago, and once this year. Both times, its
>> interface felt clunky, and it felt like it was trying to get the best of
>> IRC, Slack, and a BBS and instead getting the worst of all the worlds.
>> Synchronous communication was confusing, asynchronous communication was
>> limited, and topics and channels didn't really do anything to organize
>> things.
>>
>> I have two alternatives to add to consideration:
>> * Mattermost: it's an open-source clone of Slack, which has its
>> advantages and disadvantages, but at least it's familiar and heavily used UI
>> * Discourse: it's an asynchronous communication tool, but that may
>> acceptable or preferable, and there is already a Haskell Discourse set up (
>> https://discourse.haskell.org/)
>>
>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:59 AM Ben Gamari <ben at well-typed.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > I personally vote for irc.  Perhaps via Libera.
>>> >
>>> > What are some example vibrant  technical communities on matrix? I’ve
>>> > experienced such on irc but less so via more recent / newer platforms
>>> >
>>> I know that many subcommunities within the Rust community use Matrix. I
>>> have had quite good interactions in this context. Frankly I think that
>>> most of these newer options are technically much more conducive to
>>> technical collaboration than IRC.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> - Ben
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ghc-devs mailing list
>>> ghc-devs at haskell.org
>>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ghc-devs mailing list
>> ghc-devs at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20210519/6c705443/attachment.html>