Find constraints over type

Alejandro Serrano Mena trupill at gmail.com
Fri Jan 17 08:25:43 UTC 2020


My goal is to add type information on hover within `ghcide`. Right now,
when you select a variable, we give back the type as reported in the
corresponding Var. However, when this type involved a type variable, it
misses a lot of important information about the typing context in which we
are working. So the goal is to report back some of this typing context.

Going back to my original example:

f :: Eq a => [a] -> Bool
f xs = xs == []

It would be great if by hovering over the 'xs', one would get '[a] where Eq
a', or some other representation of the known constraints.

Since this is intended to be a help for the programmer, it doesn't really
matter whether we get "too many" constraints (for example, if we had "Ord
a" it's OK to get "Eq a" too, since that's interesting constraint
information).

Right now I am working with TypecheckModules most of the time.

Regards,
Alejandro

El jue., 16 ene. 2020 a las 19:47, Simon Peyton Jones (<
simonpj at microsoft.com>) escribió:

> There is definitely no pure way to get from ‘a’ to its constraints.
>
>    - It is far from clear what “its constraints” are.   Is (C a b) such a
>    constraint?  C [a] b?  What about superclasses?
>    - Constraints vary depending on where  you are.  GADT matches can
>    bring into scope extra constraints on existing type variables.
>
>
>
> So as Ben says, to give a sensible response you’ll need to explain more
> about your goal
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> *From:* ghc-devs <ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org> *On Behalf Of *Alejandro
> Serrano Mena
> *Sent:* 16 January 2020 16:19
> *To:* GHC developers <ghc-devs at haskell.org>
> *Subject:* Find constraints over type
>
>
>
> Dear GHC devs,
>
> I am trying to figure out a way to obtain the constraints that hold over a
> type. Let me give you an example: suppose that I write the following
> function:
>
>
>
> f :: Eq a => [a] -> Bool
>
> f xs = xs == []
>
>
>
> If I ask for the type of the Var ' xs', I get back '[a]'. This is correct,
> but I am missing the crucial information that '[a]' must be Eq.
>
>
>
> Is there an easy way to get it? It seems that 'varType' doesn't give me
> enough information.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Alejandro
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20200117/9beb740b/attachment.html>


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list