Hadrian Transitive Dependencies

Simon Peyton Jones simonpj at microsoft.com
Wed Mar 27 23:04:05 UTC 2019


This is a bit disappointing

But it’s also Absolutely Great because it means that zillions of very-hard-to-predict dependencies don’t need to be explicitly ‘needed’.

Perhaps the remaining un-tracked dependencies will be fewer and easier to nail?

Simon

From: David Eichmann <davide at well-typed.com>
Sent: 27 March 2019 18:04
To: Andrey Mokhov <andrey.mokhov at newcastle.ac.uk>; Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Cc: Neil Mitchell <ndmitchell at gmail.com>; GHC developers <ghc-devs at haskell.org>
Subject: Re: Hadrian Transitive Dependencies


Ah! I see. This is a bit disappointing as it reduces the utility of fsatrace linting: the programmer is forced to decide if shallow dependencies are sufficient (changes in deep dependencies always change shallow dependencies). Hopeful similar scenarios are rare. Perhaps the best step forward is to simply silence the linting using `trackAllow ["//*.hi"]` for haskell object rules. Then I can continue tracking down other missing dependencies in Hadrian with fsatrace linting.
On 3/27/19 5:38 PM, Andrey Mokhov wrote:
Simon's insight is great: if deep dependencies are captured by shallow dependencies then the cloud build system is correct even if only direct shallow inputs are tracked.

That's a very non-trivial invariant, and I guess this means we can't rely on fsatrace linting for GHC compilation rules, because all deep dependencies will be reported as untracked.

Cheers,
Andrey

On 27 Mar 2019 18:27, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com><mailto:simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:

With that in mind, and considering a cloud build system where "all direct inputs and direct outputs must be declared"



But I question that assumption.   As I mentioned, with GHC at least, the if a deep dependency changes then one of the shallow dependencies will change.  So I claim that even for cloud build it should be enough to depend only on shallow dependencies.



This is only true because GHC offers this guarantee.  We’d need to be sure that every deep dependency was either ‘needed’ or was reflected in the contents (perhaps via a fingerprint) another ‘needed’ thing.



Simon



From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org><mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org> On Behalf Of David Eichmann
Sent: 27 March 2019 17:12
To: Andrey Mokhov <andrey.mokhov at newcastle.ac.uk><mailto:andrey.mokhov at newcastle.ac.uk>; Neil Mitchell <ndmitchell at gmail.com><mailto:ndmitchell at gmail.com>
Cc: GHC developers <ghc-devs at haskell.org><mailto:ghc-devs at haskell.org>
Subject: Re: Hadrian Transitive Dependencies



Hello,

To reiterate some definitions consider this scenario:

  *   A.hs imports B.hs and B.hs imports C.hs
  *   `ghc -M A.hs` reports that A.o depends on: A.hs, B.hi
  *   `ghc -c A.hs` produces A.o and accesses A.hs, B.hi, and C.hi

There seems to be some confusion about the term "Direct Dependency" I'll use these definitions:

"Shallow Dependency": With respect to a haskell object file X.o, the shallow dependencies are the source file X.hs and interface files Y.hi for all modules Y imported by X.

  *   These are the dependencies of X.o as reported by `ghc -M X.hs`
  *   In the above scenario:
·

     *   A.o depends on: A.hs, B.hi

"Deep Dependency": With respect to a haskell object file X.o, the deep dependencies are all hi files required by ghc to build X.o excluding direct dependencies:

  *   This is a subset of modules transitively imported by X
  *   These dependencies are NOT reported by `ghc -M X.hs`

"Direct Dependency": if the command to create file X accesses file Y, then X directly depends on Y (= Y is a direct dependency of X).

  *   In the above scenario:
·

     *   A.o directly depends on: A.hs, B.hi, and C.hi

  *   SPJ noted that .hi files list direct dependencies.
  *   The direct dependencies of a haskell object file is the union of its shallow and deep dependencies.

"Direct Output": All files created by a rule.

With that in mind, and considering a cloud build system where "all direct inputs and direct outputs must be declared" (where this agrees with the definitions above) can we do the following for the build rule of a haskell object file X.o?

  1.  `need` the shallow dependencies as reported by `ghc -M`. This guarantees that all shallow and deep dependencies (i.e. all direct dependencies) are built.
  2.  build X.o and X.hi
  3.  Inspect X.hi to derive the direct dependencies (and hence deep dependencies)
  4.  `needed` the deep dependencies

Is there already an easy way to inspect *.hi files in this way? Is this use of `needed` valid?

- David E



On 3/27/19 3:05 PM, Andrey Mokhov wrote:

Hi David,



We had a discussion about this with Neil some time ago, and I think we had the following list of progressively more complex invariants for different types of build systems:



  *   Non-cloud build systems: *all direct inputs must be declared*. If you miss a direct input dependency then a build may complete successfully but with an incorrect result.



  *   Cloud build systems: *all direct inputs and direct outputs must be declared*. If you miss a direct output then a build may fail because the cloud will not be able to restore the corresponding output.



  *   Cloud build systems with shallow (deferred) materialisation of build artefacts: *all transitive inputs and direct outputs must be declared*. Let’s say you’d like to download the resulting GHC binary directly, without materialising any intermediate artefacts. Then you’ll need to know GHC’s ultimate transitive inputs.



I think for now we are really keen to make Hadrian a cloud build system, but whether shallow builds are valuable enough is not clear. Maybe not. Therefore, I’d say we don’t need to track transitive inputs right now. Furthermore, if we were to track all transitive inputs, we would lose the desirable early cutoff property, which prevents rebuilding after adding a comment in a file on which a lot of other files transitively depend on.



Having said that, if we really access a file during compilation, then I think it is *not* a transitive dependency by definition! Any file which is accessed during a build rule is a direct dependency.



> GHC is reading *.hi files that are not reported as dependencies by

> `ghc -M  -include-pkg-deps`. This is because they are not direct, but transitive

> dependencies!



So, here I’m confused. If we read a file A when compiling a file B, then it’s by definition a direct dependency. Perhaps we just read too much? Maybe the solution is to switch to fine-grained `ghc -M` mode, to analyse import dependencies for a single module instead of doing it transitively, which I believe was discussed in a ticket some time ago? I can’t find this ticket, but I think Alp was looking into it at some point. Alp: do you remember it?



Thank you for all your work on Hadrian!



Cheers,

Andrey



From: David Eichmann [mailto:davide at well-typed.com]
Sent: 27 March 2019 12:54
To: Neil Mitchell <ndmitchell at gmail.com><mailto:ndmitchell at gmail.com>; Andrey Mokhov <andrey.mokhov at newcastle.ac.uk><mailto:andrey.mokhov at newcastle.ac.uk>; GHC developers <ghc-devs at haskell.org><mailto:ghc-devs at haskell.org>
Subject: Hadrian Transitive Dependencies



Hello Shake/Hadrian contributors and the like,

Recently I've been putting Hadrian's fsatrace linting feature to good use, tracking down missing dependencies in Hadrian. Ultimately, we want to use shake's cloud build / shared cache feature and ensure it works across CI builds. Unfortunately the feature isn't working smoothly with Hadrian: see #16295<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.haskell.org%2Fghc%2Fghc%2Fissues%2F16295&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C5547e9d3f2ac46e99f7608d6b2de8965%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636893066265056843&sdata=pTvdTMtM1%2B4d%2BxCVaR3K%2BV%2FtqZgD%2BWQLXee7f5q53dk%3D&reserved=0>. This is very desirable to improve CI build times. It is my understanding that in order to get caching to work:

1. All accessed files must declared with `need` AND
2. All created files must be declared with `produces` (or be the target of the build rule)

Is my understanding correct? Or is there a weaker condition (perhaps only 2 is necessary)?

If I'm correct, this amounts to fixing all fsatrace lint errors. See here<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.haskell.org%2Fghc%2Fghc%2Fissues%2F16400%23note_188901&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C5547e9d3f2ac46e99f7608d6b2de8965%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636893066265056843&sdata=tazaF1KhCrosPrJ8wMw6xsyCWVLSYjpFkxHj0DS8%2B8w%3D&reserved=0> for a breakdown of lint errors / missing dependencies. A large portion of these are Haskell interface files (i.e. *.hi files). Before building a Haskell object file, dependencies are discovered via `ghc` using the `-M  -include-pkg-deps` options. Unfortunately, shake's fsatrace linting complains about other *.hi files being accessed! For example when building `stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o` we get the following dependencies from ghc:

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : libraries/mtl/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.hs

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/Prelude.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/Data/Monoid.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/RWS/Strict.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/RWS/Lazy.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Identity.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Maybe.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Except.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Error.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/lib/../lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Class.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/Writer/Class.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/State/Class.hi

_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o : _build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/Reader/Class.hi

And shake complains of the following missing deps:

_build/stage0/bin/ghc -Wall -hisuf hi -osuf o -hcsuf hc -static -hide-all-packages -no-user-package-db '-package-db _build/stage1/lib/package.conf.d' '-this-unit-id mtl-2.2.2' '-package-id base-4.13.0.0' '-package-id transformers-0.5.5.0' -i -i_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build -i_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/autogen -ilibraries/mtl/. -Iincludes -I_build/generated -I_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build -I/home/david/ghc/_build/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/include -I/home/david/ghc/_build/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/integer-gmp-1.0.2.0/include -I/home/david/ghc/_build/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/rts-1.0/include -I_build/generated -optc-I_build/generated -optP-include -optP_build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/autogen/cabal_macros.h -outputdir _build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build -Wnoncanonical-monad-instances -optc-Werror=unused-but-set-variable -optc-Wno-error=inline -c libraries/mtl/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.hs -o _build/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o -O2 -H32m -Wall -fno-warn-unused-imports -fno-warn-warnings-deprecations -Wcompat -Wnoncanonical-monad-instances -Wnoncanonical-monadfail-instances -XHaskell2010 -XSafe -ghcversion-file=/home/david/MEGA/File_Dump/Well-Typed/GHC/_nosync_git/ghc/_build/generated/ghcversion.h -Wno-deprecated-flags

Lint checking error - _build/HEAD_default/stage1/libraries/mtl/build/Control/Monad/RWS/Class.o - 22 values were used but not depended upon:

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage0/lib/settings

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage0/lib/platformConstants

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage0/lib/llvm-targets

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage0/lib/llvm-passes

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage0/lib/package.conf.d/package.cache

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/package.conf.d/package.cache

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/GHC/Float.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/GHC/Base.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/ghc-prim-0.5.3/GHC/Types.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/GHC/Maybe.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Writer/Lazy.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Writer/Strict.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/State/Lazy.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/State/Strict.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Reader.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/List.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/transformers-0.5.5.0/Control/Monad/Trans/Cont.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/ghc-prim-0.5.3/GHC/Tuple.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/GHC/IO/Exception.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/integer-gmp-1.0.2.0/GHC/Integer/Type.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/Data/Either.hi

  Used:  _build/HEAD_default/stage1/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.9.20190325/base-4.13.0.0/GHC/Natural.hi

GHC is reading *.hi files that are not reported as dependencies by `ghc -M  -include-pkg-deps`. This is because they are not direct, but transitive dependencies! How do we fix these lint errors (again with the goal of using shakes shared cache feature)? Some ideas:

* Wildly over approximate dependencies. This may be easier to implement but cause unneeded recompilation (when a false dependency changes). Either:
    * `need` all dependent packages' interface files recursively as well as transitive dependencies reported by `ghc -M  -include-pkg-deps` within the current package. OR
    * OR `need` all transitive dependencies reported by `ghc -M  -include-pkg-deps`. This will likely result in fewer dependencies but requires a bit more work in recovering dependent packages' dependency graphs.
* Perhaps transitive dependencies are not important for shared caching to work. Change shakes linting feature to allow (untracked?) transitive dependencies to be accessed.

Feed back would be greatly appreciated.

David Eichmann



--

David Eichmann, Haskell Consultant

Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.well-typed.com&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C5547e9d3f2ac46e99f7608d6b2de8965%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636893066265066852&sdata=RXD5uoyg3KKQx3wosnw5%2FOe9ha5ePVlJcFxkT%2FvHR60%3D&reserved=0>



Registered in England & Wales, OC335890

118 Wymering Mansions, Wymering Road, London W9 2NF, England

--

David Eichmann, Haskell Consultant

Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.well-typed.com&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C5547e9d3f2ac46e99f7608d6b2de8965%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636893066265076861&sdata=l5qjZq%2BVm6DEHxedjMxoqSogpbaXF0mto6TIUzrI6dQ%3D&reserved=0>



Registered in England & Wales, OC335890

118 Wymering Mansions, Wymering Road, London W9 2NF, England


--

David Eichmann, Haskell Consultant

Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.well-typed.com&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C5547e9d3f2ac46e99f7608d6b2de8965%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636893066265076861&sdata=l5qjZq%2BVm6DEHxedjMxoqSogpbaXF0mto6TIUzrI6dQ%3D&reserved=0>



Registered in England & Wales, OC335890

118 Wymering Mansions, Wymering Road, London W9 2NF, England
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20190327/548b514d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list