[ambiguous occurrence bug?]

[Shayne Fletcher]

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:23 PM Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hm. You're probably right that it should only consider the locally defined
> one,
>

Cool.


> but I can see why it would do this
>
Can you elaborate? Perhaps,


> and wonder if there's even a good way to constrain that check currently.
>
>
indicates that you can see why it might be so based on knowledge of the
implementation?

-- 
Shayne Fletcher
Language Engineer
c: +1 917 699 7763
e: shayne.fletcher at daml.com
Digital Asset Holdings, LLC
4 World Trade Center                                                        150
Greenwich Street, 47th Floor
<https://maps.google.com/?q=150+Greenwich+Street,+47th+Floor%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+New+York,+NY+10007,+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
New York, NY 10007, USA
<https://maps.google.com/?q=150+Greenwich+Street,+47th+Floor%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+New+York,+NY+10007,+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
digitalasset.com <http://www.digitalasset.com/>

-- 
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, 
may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary 
and subject to important terms and conditions available at 
http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html 
<http://www.digitalasset.com/emaildisclaimer.html>. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please delete this message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20190317/b6768717/attachment.html>