Hadrian questions

[Richard Eisenberg]

In the "devel2" flavor, I also seem to have built Haddock. `make` didn't do this with devel2, and I'd prefer Hadrian didn't, too.

Maybe I'm not really on the devel2 flavor?

> On Jan 24, 2019, at 11:02 PM, Richard Eisenberg <rae at cs.brynmawr.edu> wrote:
> 
> As suggested, I'm trying out Hadrian. I have a few questions.
> 
> - After building GHC the first time, I often go into the /ghc directory and then do `make 2` to build just the stage-2 compiler. Is that now the same as `build --freeze1`? It would seem not (I haven't tested), because running `make 2` builds only the compiler, not the libraries. Can this workflow be replicated in Hadrian?
> 
> - I have `userDefaultFlavour = "devel2"` in my hadrian/UserSettings.hs file. But I see build artifacts during compilation of stage-2 that have dyn_o and p_o extensions. I don't want these. Have I done something wrong? Or are these artifacts now necessary?
> 
> - I have quite a few ghc directories. What are the dependencies of Hadrian so that I can install these into my global package database and avoiding rebuilding them for each ghc tree? (Please don't tell me that the global package database is bad for my health. I know that, and I know why, but it's still terribly convenient, and I'm happy to pay the occasional price for that convenience.)
> 
> I'm sure I'll have more questions.
> 
> Thanks!
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs