Can I get the internal name of a package at runtime?
MarLinn
monkleyon at gmail.com
Sat Oct 14 19:59:03 UTC 2017
That sounds reasonable, but also like there *can not be* a way to obtain
that hash at runtime. And therefore, no way to discover the true package
name.
Which in turn makes discovery and loading of plug-ins a bit harder.
Well, I guess it's for a good reason so I'll have to work around it.
Good to know.
Thanks for helping out!
Cheers,
MarLinn
On 2017-10-14 20:11, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, MarLinn <monkleyon at gmail.com
> <mailto:monkleyon at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> So the "actual" package name seems to be
> "Plugin-0.0.0.0-2QaFQQzYhnKJSPRXA7VtPe".
> That leaves the random(?) characters behind the version number to
> be explained.
>
>
> ABI hash of that specific package build, which is needed because
> compiling with different optimization levels etc. will change what
> part of the internals gets exposed in the .hi file for inlining into
> other modules; mismatches there lead to *really* weird behavior. (If
> you're lucky, it'll "just" be a type mismatch in code you didn't
> write, because it came from the .hi file. If unlucky, it compiles but
> dumps core at runtime.)
>
> --
> brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
> allbery.b at gmail.com <mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com>
> ballbery at sinenomine.net <mailto:ballbery at sinenomine.net>
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list