Nofib runtimes sensitivity to RTS changes
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Sun Feb 12 15:31:40 UTC 2017
Hi,
this is mostly a rant, targeted at the very vague fact that runtime
performance benchmarks are so damn hard.
This commit just came in:
https://git.haskell.org/ghc.git/commitdiff/56c9bb39246f9ffd8ed41a0656bfe8e60d23be57
Clearly, only parts of the profiling RTS have changed.
This is what perf.haskell.org measures:
https://perf.haskell.org/ghc/#revision/56c9bb39246f9ffd8ed41a0656bfe8e60d23be57
Highlights:
nofib/time/cryptarithm1 0.502 + 9.36% 0.549 seconds
nofib/time/fasta 0.406 + 4.43% 0.424 seconds
These changes are permanent, i.e. the following commits consistently
give the higher runtimes.
But nofib does not even run the profiling RTS!
*very audible sigh*
(Conclusion: Ignore runtime changes in nofib when the RTS has changed,
the results are simply unusable.)
I also wonder if we can adjust the input and parameters to nofib (in a
new “veryslow” setting) to get them all run in a few seconds on modern
hardware, instead of subseconds.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20170212/60c2c22c/attachment.sig>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list