simple pictures about GHC development flow
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Sat Oct 29 17:59:30 UTC 2016
Am Samstag, den 29.10.2016, 21:36 +0900 schrieb Takenobu Tani:
> Hi Ben, Joachim,
> > 2016-10-29 1:36 GMT+09:00 Ben Gamari <ben at smart-cactus.org>:
> > > There is a box „committer flow“. What exactly is meant by that? Is
> > > there more to be said about that?
> > >
> > I think this means someone with commit bits simply pushing a patch
> > without submitting to code review. Ideally we'd be able to deprecate
> > this workflow in favor of the "auto-validating push" that you've
> > proposed.
> I assumed that "committer flow" is simply pushing a patch without
> submitting to code review or without discussion.
> I thought committers  have the authority in case of typo or small
> Do I misunderstand?
I see. The term “flow” suggested something deeper or more structured
(which might be good, but is not the case). Maybe relabel it “direct
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the ghc-devs