Local bindings in the static form
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Fri Mar 4 10:47:34 UTC 2016
Facundo
Yes, that makes perfect sense. Moreover, it is pretty much exactly what the tct_closed flag on `ATcId` does.
The trick will be to guarantee that all those Ids do in fact end up being floated out.
We could have a Skype chat about this, preferably after the March 16 ICFP deadline
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Facundo Domínguez
| Sent: 03 March 2016 19:41
| To: ghc-devs at haskell.org
| Subject: Local bindings in the static form
|
| Hello,
| At Tweag I/O we are considering relaxing a bit the constraints on the
| static form.
|
| static <exp>
|
| demands <exp> to be closed. That is, the free variables of <exp> must
| be bound at the top level.
|
| However, it would be fine to allow local bindings too. For instance:
|
| test :: StaticPtr ([[Int]] -> [[Int]])
| test x = static (filter hasZero)
| where
| hasZero = any isZero
| isZero = (0 ==)
|
| Where hasZero is local but its body can be considered kind of closed
| (all free variables refer to top-level bindings or other *closed* local
| bindings.).
|
| We would need for this implementation a way to test closedness in this
| sense. Could there be any similar test implemented already in GHC?
|
| Thanks,
| Facundo
|
| [1] https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11656
| _______________________________________________
| ghc-devs mailing list
| ghc-devs at haskell.org
| https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmail.ha
| skell.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fghc-
| devs&data=01%7c01%7csimonpj%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7cead97b273efa41c1
| a49608d3439bd142%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=Z1TbBcSgd
| YLZ%2bXrMJVMvqJIfwc4R2kLeRaPPwuQ5%2fLQ%3d
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list