vectorisation code?

Geoffrey Mainland mainland at
Fri Jan 22 16:39:25 UTC 2016

On 1/22/16 11:36 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> On 2016-01-22 at 17:23:18 +0100, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>> I didn't mean to suggest that DPH should be part of every build, just
>> that it should be part of *some* regular build.
>> If we're willing to do that, then I'm certainly willing to get DPH
>> back up and running.
> What's the situation with the `vector`/`primitive` packages if DPH is to
> be resuscitated? Does the official `vector` package need to be made
> DPH-aware?

The vector and primitive packages will not need to be changed in any
significant way, and perhaps not at all. It's possible we might need a
few patches to vector to, e.g., expose a data constructor somewhere, so
I can't promise that we will need zero changes.


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list