Help needed: Restrictions of proc-notation with RebindableSyntax

[Brandon Allbery]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Given that little new code seems to be being written with Arrows in mind,
> while some older code makes heavy use of it (hxt, etc.), refactoring the
> arrow hierarchy is kind of a hard sell. It is by no means impossible, just
> something that would require a fair bit of community wrangling and a lot of
> work showing clear advantages to a new status quo at a time when its very
> hard to get anybody to care about arrow notation at all.
>

The arrowized-FRP folks seem to care a fair bit.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20161221/8497fa00/attachment.html>