alex.dzyoba at gmail.com
Fri Apr 22 07:14:56 UTC 2016
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:50:14PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I don’t think it is entirely unrelated, but there is a separate ticket
> about this:
> It even proposes a fix.
> But if you want to be unblocked in implementing #11297, simply comment
> out the assertion in Literal.hs (just for you), or compile without
Without asserts it's reproducing. Thanks a lot!
> > Is there anything I can do with this? Is it because that test has
> > 64-bit unboxed integers and I'm running it on 32-bit VM?
> Right, but that is the point of #11297: The test case is tailored to 64
> bit, and the task is to create a second test case with 32 bit numbers.
Yes, I saw that it's tricking integer overflow but only for 64 bit. I will come
back later with the new test.
More information about the ghc-devs