Unlifted data types
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Mon Sep 7 19:41:05 UTC 2015
| Michael Greenberg points out on Twitter that suspend must be a special
| form, just like lambda abstraction.
This isn't reflected on the wiki.
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Edward
| Z. Yang
| Sent: 04 September 2015 16:46
| To: Eric Seidel; ghc-devs
| Subject: Re: Unlifted data types
|
| Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of 2015-09-04 08:43:48 -0700:
| > Yes. Actually, you have a good point that we'd like to have functions
| > 'force :: Int -> !Int' and 'suspend :: !Int -> Int'. Unfortunately, we
| > can't generate 'Coercible' instances for these types unless Coercible
| becomes
| > polykinded. Perhaps we can make a new type class, or just magic
| > polymorphic functions.
|
| Michael Greenberg points out on Twitter that suspend must be a special
| form, just like lambda abstraction.
|
| Edward
| _______________________________________________
| ghc-devs mailing list
| ghc-devs at haskell.org
| http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list