spj-wildcard-refactor
Alan & Kim Zimmerman
alan.zimm at gmail.com
Fri Nov 20 17:42:26 UTC 2015
I would imagine
git pull # Get master up to date
git checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor
git rebase -i master
The -i will let you flatten commits
See
https://robots.thoughtbot.com/git-interactive-rebase-squash-amend-rewriting-history
Alan
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
wrote:
> Status on my spj-wildcard-refactor patch
>
> · I’m down to one test failure a modest perf regression on T3064.
> This is really a test of type family reduction which is nothing to do
> with my changes, so I have no idea what’s happening there. I’m waiting
> till I can build a profiled compiler to test.
>
>
>
> What’s the best workflow for to take my branch with tons of wibble-ish
> patches, and commit to HEAD with a small number of sensible patches.
>
>
>
> I was thinking:
>
> · Git checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor
>
> · Git merge master
>
> · Git reset master (leaves working files alone)
>
> · Now commit patches
>
> Is that right?
>
>
>
> Simon
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20151120/3d82bfb2/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list