ghc-7.10 branch regression
Erik de Castro Lopo
mle+hs at mega-nerd.com
Wed Apr 15 10:12:35 UTC 2015
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> At this point we need to decide whether:
>
> a) Require llvm-3.6 for 7.10.2 and later.
I've done some testing on the ghc-7.10 branch (with a couple of patches
cherry picked from master) with llvm-3.6 on amd64-linux. WIth this,
there are 17 unexpected failures during validate:
deriving/should_fail T7959 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
deriving/should_fail drvfail005 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
deriving/should_fail drvfail009 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
indexed-types/should_fail SimpleFail14 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
typecheck/should_compile T10195 [exit code non-0] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail T2994 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail T3540 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail T7778 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail tcfail036 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail tcfail057 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail tcfail063 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail tcfail134 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail tcfail146 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail tcfail147 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail tcfail151 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_fail tcfail209 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
All bit one oft these all seem to be stderr mismatches rather than
actual problems.
My validate run on armhf is still running.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list