Question about `validate` workflow

Joachim Breitner mail at
Sun Nov 9 19:42:08 UTC 2014


Am Samstag, den 08.11.2014, 22:33 -0500 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
> I've stopped validating locally, allowing Travis to do it for me. If
> you use a `wip/...` branch and push to the main GHC repo, you can find
> build reports at Or, I'm sure if you clue
> Travis in, this can also work if you push to your own GitHub fork of
> GHC.

of course this spams ghc-commits quite a lot. So while I think it’s
reasonable to use this method to validate something that you expect to
pass, I would advice using your own GitHub fork if you do trial and
error. It’s just takes a few clicks or so to set it up, including
enabling Travis.


Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de
  Jabber: nomeata at  • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the ghc-devs mailing list