Releasing containers 0.5.3.2 -- before GHC 7.8?

[Roman Cheplyaka]

* Ryan Newton <rrnewton at gmail.com> [2014-01-14 11:41:48-0500]
> Replacing containers seems like a real pain for end users

Is it a real pain? Why?

I just tried 'cabal install containers', and it went flawlessly.

To make it clear, I'm not in any way opposed to containers upgrade, but
that phrase struck me as odd.

The only issue I'm aware of is related to the GHC API, but
high-performance parallel algorithms and the GHC API are rarely used
together in the same project.

Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140114/b6170b9f/attachment-0001.sig>