Pattern synonyms for 7.8?

[Dr. ÉRDI Gergő]

Of course. That's how I've been keeping up with GHC proper all along.
On Jan 8, 2014 7:09 AM, "Mateusz Kowalczyk" <fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk> wrote:

> On 07/01/14 23:05, Dr. ÉRDI Gergő wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wow, so, I thought there would be some back-and-forth, then a decision,
> > then I would go and walk the last mile and then formally submit the patch
> > for review - and now I see that in <2 days all that has passed...
> >
> > Of course I'll make validate pass, I just didn't even know about it.
> > Likewise, I needed the carrot of 7.8 inclusion dangling before me to
> start
> > writing the user docs.
> >
> > One problem, though, is that I'll be on holiday from tomorrow, so I'll
> only
> > have time to look into this tonight before next weekend. I'll try my best
> > to fix up validate tonight, and I'll write the docs (which I hope will
> > mostly be an editing job on the wiki) next week. How does that sound?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gergo
>
> Hi Erdi,
>
> I'm hoping to push in some stuff for Haddock in few hours (or rather,
> have someone do it for me) but I know you have changed a few things in
> it for the pattern synonyms stuff. I looked at the changes and they
> weren't big and shouldn't clash. Is it fine with you to push the changes
> on our side and then have you merge on top of that or would you prefer
> to have it done another way?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> Mateusz K.
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140108/fd5d2b28/attachment-0001.html>