High-level Cmm code and stack allocation

[Carter Schonwald]

i'm inclined to assume that its a parser error.
instead of (v)= call fun(args...argn);, did you try v = call fun(args1...n)
; ?


On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr at gnu.org> wrote:

> On 2014-01-05 at 00:26:52 +0100, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > So is this valid high-level Cmm code? What's the proper way to allocate
> > Stack (and/or Heap) memory from high-level Cmm code?
>
> PS: ...are function calls supposed to work as advertised in
>
>     https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y#L76
>
> ?
>
> I've tried using `(ret1,ret2) = call stg_fun (arg1,arg2);` in a Cmm
> file, but I get a parser error on `call` with GHC HEAD; only when leave
> out the return value assignement, i.e. when I use only `call stg_fun
> (arg1,arg2);`, it gets parsed succesfully. Is this a bug in the
> CmmParser?
>
> Cheers,
>   hvr
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140104/4648c5cc/attachment.html>