Status and future of the LLVM backend
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Mon Dec 1 08:42:48 UTC 2014
Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 18:49 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> > Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 16:48 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> >> > What would be a reliable way to make the build system pass
> >> > -B/usr/bin/ld.gold to gcc? Is
> >> > SRC_HC_OPTS += -optc-B/usr/bin/ld.gold
> >> > in mk/build.mk a good idea?
> >> >
> >> Indeed this is much cleaner. I just wanted a way to accomplish this
> >> without editing build.mk.
> > Cleaner maybe, but it was not picked up either. Or maybe we are looking
> > at a different issue, not solved by using ld.gold?
> I suspect that it this is the gold issue. I should have looked at your
> command line a bit more carefully; I suspect you want
> SRC_HC_OPTS += -optl-B/usr/bin/ld.gold
> Hopefully this will do it; at least the option appears to make it to the
> right phase now.
Trying it right now...
> Is the Debian packaging tracked in version control somewhere? All I can
> find is the packaging tarball .
It’s at http://darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/experimental/ghc
(but due to a index.html in that directory, you cannot browse it, so you
have to "darcs get" it)
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the ghc-devs