Moving Haddock *development* out of GHC tree

Carter Schonwald carter.schonwald at
Thu Aug 14 00:43:50 UTC 2014

one thing I wonder about is how should we approach noting
 "theres a new language constructor, we should figure out a good way to
present it in haddock" in this work flow?
because the initial haddocks presentation might just be a strawman till
someone thinks about it carefully right?

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvriedel at>

> On 2014-08-14 at 00:09:40 +0200, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
> [...]
> > I don't know what the GHC branch name will be yet. ‘ghc-head’ makes most
> > sense but IIRC Herbert had some objections as it had been used in the
> > past for something else, but maybe he can pitch in.
> I had no objections at all to that name, 'ghc-head' is fine with me :-)
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the ghc-devs mailing list