Overloaded record fields: we ought to change the name of FldTy

[Johan Tibell]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Adam Gundry <adam at well-typed.com> wrote:

> If possible, I'd prefer to merge the existing patches more or less as
> is, then I can work on the library design without continually needing to
> fix merge conflicts.
>

Agreed. We should try to get the patches in sooner rather than later to
avoid extra work for you and allow people to try the feature.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140430/e4c305eb/attachment-0001.html>