questions about validating in the presence of known failures
Nicolas Frisby
nicolas.frisby at gmail.com
Thu May 2 17:23:26 CEST 2013
[You can generalize this email from OS X to other architectures/operating
systems.]
Question 1: Is a list of "unexpecteds expected on OS X" maintained
somewhere? The comments on #5757 seemed like a start, but they're 1.5 years
old.
The Trac "Custom Query" for OS X isn't helpful for my actual question of
"can I ignore these wrt to validating my patch?".
A wiki page collating tickets for any "known unexpecteds" for OS X (and
other OSs) would be helpful.
Question 2: Can we add another bit to unexpected results marking them as
known/unknown?
That would yield an immediacy for the validation workflow in the cases
where we have long-standing known bugs, eg on various platforms. I think
#5757 is on the right path, but marking a test that should pass as an
expected failure seems disappointing. Is there a traditional workflow for
handling this?
Question 3: What's the status on the build bot farm?
Thanks for your time, everyone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130502/499ce2cc/attachment.htm>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list