[GHC DevOps Group] The future of Phabricator
Carter Schonwald
carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Sat Sep 18 16:23:13 UTC 2021
In one sense our migration was prescient, on the other hand i really wish
gitlab had a more performant code review ux.
Are there any performant for large code review tools? I find the reload
rendering latency and auto collapse defaults in gitlab pretty painful and
I’m pretty ignorant of the land scape these days.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:27 PM Niklas Hambüchen via ghc-devs <
ghc-devs at haskell.org> wrote:
> For those interested:
>
> Three years later, Phabricator shut down.
>
> May 29, 2021:
>
> https://admin.phacility.com/phame/post/view/11/phacility_is_winding_down_operations/
>
> On 10/30/18 5:54 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > For one, at this point we have no options for support in the event that
> > something goes wrong as the company responsible for Phabricator,
> > Phacility, has closed their support channels to non-paying customers.
> > Furthermore, in the past year or two Phacility has been placing their
> > development resources in the parts their customers pay them for, which
> > appear to be much different that the parts that we actively use. For
> > this reason, some parts that we rely on seem oddly half-finished.
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devops-group/attachments/20210918/d35fe788/attachment.html>
More information about the Ghc-devops-group
mailing list