[GHC DevOps Group] CI

[Boespflug, Mathieu]

On 12 October 2017 at 19:07, Ben Gamari <ben at well-typed.com> wrote:
> "Boespflug, Mathieu" <m at tweag.io> writes:
>
>> Some extra points by Jonas, that I'm just forwarding:
>>
>> - CircleCI & Appveyor Cons: dependent on third-party for feature development.
>> - Funding: on one side we have free RackSpace servers, on the other
>> side CircleCI might be willing to fund as well.
>
> Right, I think one of us should get in touch with CircleCI to see
> whether they would be willing to offer us an extension of their usual
> open-source offer. That would certainly change the equation a bit.
> Perhaps Manuel or I could do this?

To Greg's point, if we have specific data that would justify a
specific level of build job parallelism that we'd like to achieve,
then that might be worth a shot, yes.