[Git][ghc/ghc][wip/tsan/fix-races] 17 commits: Fix thunk update ordering
Ben Gamari (@bgamari)
gitlab at gitlab.haskell.org
Wed Dec 13 21:55:48 UTC 2023
Ben Gamari pushed to branch wip/tsan/fix-races at Glasgow Haskell Compiler / GHC
Commits:
c1767fa7 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:54:26-05:00
Fix thunk update ordering
Previously we attempted to ensure soundness of concurrent thunk update
by synchronizing on the access of the thunk's info table pointer field.
This was believed to be sufficient since the indirectee (which may
expose a closure allocated by another core) would not be examined
until the info table pointer update is complete.
However, it turns out that this can result in data races in the presence
of multiple threads racing a update a single thunk. For instance,
consider this interleaving under the old scheme:
Thread A Thread B
--------- ---------
t=0 Enter t
1 Push update frame
2 Begin evaluation
4 Pause thread
5 t.indirectee=tso
6 Release t.info=BLACKHOLE
7 ... (e.g. GC)
8 Resume thread
9 Finish evaluation
10 Relaxed t.indirectee=x
11 Load t.info
12 Acquire fence
13 Inspect t.indirectee
14 Release t.info=BLACKHOLE
Here Thread A enters thunk `t` but is soon paused, resulting in `t`
being lazily blackholed at t=6. Then, at t=10 Thread A finishes
evaluation and updates `t.indirectee` with a relaxed store.
Meanwhile, Thread B enters the blackhole. Under the old scheme this
would introduce an acquire-fence but this would only synchronize with
Thread A at t=6. Consequently, the result of the evaluation, `x`, is not
visible to Thread B, introducing a data race.
We fix this by treating the `indirectee` field as we do all other
mutable fields. This means we must always access this field with
acquire-loads and release-stores.
See #23185.
- - - - -
bcb8dafc by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts: Fix data race in threadPaused
This only affects an assertion in the debug RTS and only needs relaxed
ordering.
- - - - -
0b99afb8 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
cmm: Introduce MO_RelaxedRead
In hand-written Cmm it can sometimes be necessary to atomically load
from memory deep within an expression (e.g. see the `CHECK_GC` macro).
This MachOp provides a convenient way to do so without breaking the
expression into multiple statements.
- - - - -
755f66bb by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
codeGen: Use relaxed accesses in ticky bumping
- - - - -
78126ba5 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts: Fix data race in Interpreter's preemption check
- - - - -
06f3207a by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts: Fix data race in threadStatus#
- - - - -
6e6174cf by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
base: use atomic write when updating timer manager
- - - - -
972216f9 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
Use relaxed atomics to manipulate TSO status fields
- - - - -
f2d5acca by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts: Add necessary barriers when manipulating TSO owner
- - - - -
3302cbb1 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts: Fix synchronization on thread blocking state
- - - - -
1d3649e1 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts: Use relaxed ordering on dirty/clean info tables updates
When changing the dirty/clean state of a mutable object we needn't have
any particular ordering.
- - - - -
b0fcd1ba by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
codeGen: Use relaxed-read in closureInfoPtr
- - - - -
2e190915 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
STM: Use acquire loads when possible
Full sequential consistency is not needed here.
- - - - -
740c3e62 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts/Messages: Fix data race
- - - - -
42cc9534 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts/Prof: Fix data race
- - - - -
8697403c by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts: Use fence rather than redundant load
Previously we would use an atomic load to ensure acquire ordering.
However, we now have `ACQUIRE_FENCE_ON`, which allows us to express this
more directly.
- - - - -
a5d03211 by Ben Gamari at 2023-12-13T16:55:36-05:00
rts: Fix data races in profiling timer
- - - - -
30 changed files:
- compiler/GHC/Cmm/Expr.hs
- compiler/GHC/Cmm/Info.hs
- compiler/GHC/Cmm/MachOp.hs
- compiler/GHC/Cmm/Parser.y
- compiler/GHC/Cmm/ThreadSanitizer.hs
- compiler/GHC/CmmToAsm/AArch64/CodeGen.hs
- compiler/GHC/CmmToAsm/PPC/CodeGen.hs
- compiler/GHC/CmmToAsm/Wasm/FromCmm.hs
- compiler/GHC/CmmToAsm/X86/CodeGen.hs
- compiler/GHC/CmmToC.hs
- compiler/GHC/CmmToLlvm/CodeGen.hs
- compiler/GHC/StgToCmm/Bind.hs
- compiler/GHC/StgToCmm/Ticky.hs
- compiler/GHC/StgToCmm/Utils.hs
- libraries/base/src/GHC/Event/Thread.hs
- rts/Apply.cmm
- rts/Compact.cmm
- rts/Exception.cmm
- rts/Heap.c
- rts/HeapStackCheck.cmm
- rts/Interpreter.c
- rts/Messages.c
- rts/PrimOps.cmm
- rts/Proftimer.c
- rts/RaiseAsync.c
- rts/STM.c
- rts/Schedule.c
- rts/StableName.c
- rts/StgMiscClosures.cmm
- rts/StgStartup.cmm
The diff was not included because it is too large.
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/dd93ee4acfe088b82d9587b1a5b577e59197ceec...a5d0321143668d95bd74549c541bcddb32dcbc13
--
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/dd93ee4acfe088b82d9587b1a5b577e59197ceec...a5d0321143668d95bd74549c541bcddb32dcbc13
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/attachments/20231213/012ef7e2/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-commits
mailing list