[Git][ghc/ghc][wip/marge_bot_batch_merge_job] 4 commits: simplifier: Kill off ufKeenessFactor

Marge Bot gitlab at gitlab.haskell.org
Wed Apr 8 13:13:13 UTC 2020



 Marge Bot pushed to branch wip/marge_bot_batch_merge_job at Glasgow Haskell Compiler / GHC


Commits:
3d2991f8 by Ben Gamari at 2020-04-07T18:36:09-04:00
simplifier: Kill off ufKeenessFactor

We used to have another factor, ufKeenessFactor, which would scale the
discounts before they were subtracted from the size. This was justified
with the following comment:

  -- We multiple the raw discounts (args_discount and result_discount)
  -- ty opt_UnfoldingKeenessFactor because the former have to do with
  --  *size* whereas the discounts imply that there's some extra
  --  *efficiency* to be gained (e.g. beta reductions, case reductions)
  -- by inlining.

However, this is highly suspect since it means that we subtract a
*scaled* size from an absolute size, resulting in crazy (e.g. negative)
scores in some cases (#15304). We consequently killed off
ufKeenessFactor and bumped up the ufUseThreshold to compensate.

Adjustment of unfolding use threshold
=====================================

Since this removes a discount from our inlining heuristic, I revisited our
default choice of -funfolding-use-threshold to minimize the change in
overall inlining behavior. Specifically, I measured runtime allocations
and executable size of nofib and the testsuite performance tests built
using compilers (and core libraries) built with several values of
-funfolding-use-threshold.

This comes as a result of a quantitative comparison of testsuite
performance and code size as a function of ufUseThreshold, comparing
GHC trees using values of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100. The test set
consisted of nofib and the testsuite performance tests.
A full summary of these measurements are found in the description of
!2608

Comparing executable sizes (relative to the base commit) across all
nofib tests, we see that sizes are similar to the baseline:

            gmean      min      max   median
thresh
50         -6.36%   -7.04%   -4.82%   -6.46%
60         -5.04%   -5.97%   -3.83%   -5.11%
70         -2.90%   -3.84%   -2.31%   -2.92%
80         -0.75%   -2.16%   -0.42%   -0.73%
90         +0.24%   -0.41%   +0.55%   +0.26%
100        +1.36%   +0.80%   +1.64%   +1.37%
baseline   +0.00%   +0.00%   +0.00%   +0.00%

Likewise, looking at runtime allocations we see that 80 gives slightly
better optimisation than the baseline:

            gmean      min      max   median
thresh
50         +0.16%   -0.16%   +4.43%   +0.00%
60         +0.09%   -0.00%   +3.10%   +0.00%
70         +0.04%   -0.09%   +2.29%   +0.00%
80         +0.02%   -1.17%   +2.29%   +0.00%
90         -0.02%   -2.59%   +1.86%   +0.00%
100        +0.00%   -2.59%   +7.51%   -0.00%
baseline   +0.00%   +0.00%   +0.00%   +0.00%

Finally, I had to add a NOINLINE in T4306 to ensure that `upd` is
worker-wrappered as the test expects. This makes me wonder whether the
inlining heuristic is now too liberal as `upd` is quite a large
function. The same measure was taken in T12600.

             Wall clock time compiling Cabal with -O0
thresh       50     60     70     80     90      100    baseline
build-Cabal  93.88  89.58  92.59  90.09  100.26  94.81  89.13

Also, this change happens to avoid the spurious test output in
`plugin-recomp-change` and `plugin-recomp-change-prof` (see #17308).

Metric Decrease:
    hie002
    T12234
    T13035
    T13719
    T14683
    T4801
    T5631
    T5642
    T9020
    T9872d
    T9961
Metric Increase:
    T12150
    T12425
    T13701
    T14697
    T15426
    T1969
    T3064
    T5837
    T6048
    T9203
    T9872a
    T9872b
    T9872c
    T9872d
    haddock.Cabal
    haddock.base
    haddock.compiler

- - - - -
255418da by Sylvain Henry at 2020-04-07T18:36:49-04:00
Modules: type-checker (#13009)

Update Haddock submodule

- - - - -
04b6cf94 by Ryan Scott at 2020-04-07T19:43:20-04:00
Make NoExtCon fields strict

This changes every unused TTG extension constructor to be strict in
its field so that the pattern-match coverage checker is smart enough
any such constructors are unreachable in pattern matches. This lets
us remove nearly every use of `noExtCon` in the GHC API. The only
ones we cannot remove are ones underneath uses of `ghcPass`, but that
is only because GHC 8.8's and 8.10's coverage checkers weren't smart
enough to perform this kind of reasoning. GHC HEAD's coverage
checker, on the other hand, _is_ smart enough, so we guard these uses
of `noExtCon` with CPP for now.

Bumps the `haddock` submodule.

Fixes #17992.

- - - - -
3ff8d360 by Ryan Scott at 2020-04-08T09:12:58-04:00
Handle promoted data constructors in typeToLHsType correctly

Instead of using `nlHsTyVar`, which hardcodes `NotPromoted`, have
`typeToLHsType` pick between `Promoted` and `NotPromoted` by checking
if a type constructor is promoted using `isPromotedDataCon`.

Fixes #18020.

- - - - -


30 changed files:

- CODEOWNERS
- compiler/GHC.hs
- compiler/GHC/Cmm/Expr.hs
- compiler/GHC/Cmm/Node.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Arity.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Class.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion/Axiom.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion/Opt.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/FamInstEnv.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/InstEnv.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Lint.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Op/CSE.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Op/OccurAnal.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Op/Simplify.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Op/Specialise.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/PatSyn.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Predicate.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Rules.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/FVs.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/Ppr.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/Rep.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/TyCon.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Type.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Unfold.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Unify.hs
- compiler/GHC/CoreToStg/Prep.hs
- compiler/GHC/Driver/Backpack.hs
- compiler/GHC/Driver/Flags.hs


The diff was not included because it is too large.


View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/087e84e1c97dfd41ef4f3baaf810caef0b6a9c05...3ff8d3604b3dc946f968347aa524a4436efee18d

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/087e84e1c97dfd41ef4f3baaf810caef0b6a9c05...3ff8d3604b3dc946f968347aa524a4436efee18d
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/attachments/20200408/d68d49ed/attachment.html>


More information about the ghc-commits mailing list