Anybody using the "top-down" solver?

[Oleg Grenrus]

I doubt this list has good coverage. You probably should try haskell-cafe?

Another way to put this question:

  Is anybody is still using GHC 6.x?

Cheers,
Oleg

> On 09 Nov 2015, at 06:29, Bardur Arantsson <spam at scientician.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Just to get input from as many people as possible: I was pondering a
> plan for modularizing the solver[1] and wanted to reach as many people
> as possible with my question:
> 
>   Is anybody is still using the top-down solver?
> 
> Please respond to this list if you are, especially if you're doing so
> because there's no other way to get the modular solver to do what you
> want. (Obviously, I'm not promising to fix any problems you may have
> with the modular solver, but it would be valuable information since it
> could affect the decision of whether we have to keep the top-down solver
> around.)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> [1] https://github.com/haskell/cabal/pull/2768#issuecomment-154917165
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cabal-devel mailing list
> cabal-devel at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20151109/a1f3c8fa/attachment.sig>