New minor 1.22 release?

[Ryan Thomas]

Sounds good to me.

On Wednesday, 15 April 2015, Luite Stegeman <stegeman at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that would be ok. But I'd like to get the version number of the
> 1.22 branch bumped and update the Cabal submodule in GHC so I can run more
> tests as early as possible and perhaps avoid more embarassing bugs like
> this.
>
> Would it be ok if I bumped the 1.22 branch (to 1.22.3.0 ?). Then when you
> roll the release we can just update the submodule again.
>
> luite
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ryan Thomas <ryan at ryant.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ryan at ryant.org');>> wrote:
>
>> Hey Luite,
>>
>> I can do one but unfortunately I'm in Vietnam without any of my keys
>> until Sunday. If it can wait until then I would be happy to do it when I
>> return home.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, 15 April 2015, Luite Stegeman <stegeman at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','stegeman at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately GHC 7.10.1 shipped with a Cabal library that handles
>>> ghcjs-pkg version numbers wrong, making it unusable to boot GHCJS.
>>>
>>> I'd like 7.10.2 to ship with a working version (7.10.2 itself also
>>> contains an important bugfix for GHCJS), which would require a new minor
>>> version release. Can we do one soon? Let me know if I can do anything to
>>> help!
>>>
>>> luite
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20150415/5a388a89/attachment.html>