Library version choosing of cabal sandbox build

[Roman Cheplyaka]

This doesn't make sense to me. Can you elaborate?

* Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> [2014-07-16 10:00:59+0200]
> Right
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Daniel Trstenjak <
> daniel.trstenjak at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi Johan,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 01:07:17PM +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:
> > > Cabal is allowed to use any version that fullfills the required bounds.
> > It uses
> > > a heuristic the tends to prefer
> > >
> > >  * installed
> > >  * newest
> > >  * other
> > >
> > > in that order.
> >
> > Just to make it clear, a cabal sandbox build does consider the installed
> > libraries in the user package database, right?
> >
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Daniel
> > _______________________________________________
> > cabal-devel mailing list
> > cabal-devel at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
> >

> _______________________________________________
> cabal-devel mailing list
> cabal-devel at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20140716/bc1a0c63/attachment.sig>