New cabal-install release (and schedule) needed

[Bryan O'Sullivan]

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Mikhail Glushenkov <
the.dead.shall.rise at gmail.com> wrote:

> So the idea is that stable always corresponds to the latest stable
> release.


Yes.


> Will there be a branch where active development happens while
> master is frozen?


I wouldn't think so. I'd just expect people to delay pull requests for a
little while during a freeze, to keep things simplest for the people
involved. (Yes, we could have three branches instead, but I'd prefer to try
the simpler structure to begin with.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20120827/39999497/attachment.htm>