duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Wed Mar 5 04:40:29 EST 2008
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 08:41 +0000, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> > Both errors are a consequence of the fact that we do not know what
> > packages are installed for hugs. It is printing all the packages that it
> > thinks are missing, that is... none.
> For cabal-install, I can accept this. But from what you are saying
> cabal seems to have recently become broken so that it just won't work
> with Hugs at all? That is a real shame.
> So that second error simply needs to be fixed because the Cabal lib
> has previously worked with implementations that do not track installed
> packages. The sensible fix is probably just to skip the check entirely
> for hugs and other implementations where we do not know the installed
And I've pushed the fix:
Wed Mar 5 02:36:26 GMT 2008 Duncan Coutts <duncan at haskell.org>
* Fix configure for hugs where we don't know what packages are installed
For Hugs, nhc98 and other compilers we do not know what packages are
already installed, so we just make some up, pretend that they do exist
and just hope for the best. We make them up based on what other package
the package we're currently building happens to depend on.
See inventBogusPackageId. Let's hope they really are installed... :-)
One could see this as all rather redundant - carefully making up bogus
information to satisfy a careful check. I prefer to see it as making
explicit something that was previously implicit. The proper solution is
to discover what packages are currently installed.
> > For a future hugs release it would be enormously helpful if it would
> > include the InstalledPackageInfo files for all the bundled packages and
> > if there was a way of discovering what directory to look in to find
> > these packages. Then we could build a proper index of the installed
> > packages as we do for ghc. Also we need a hugs --version flag so Cabal
> > can actually figure out the hugs version so it knows whether it supports
> > an installed package database. Currently hugs is almost unversioned
> > (check System.Info.compilerVersion).
> File suffient bugs (http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hugs) and
> hopefully they will get fixed.
More information about the cabal-devel