cpphs and C++-style comments
Malcolm.Wallace at cs.york.ac.uk
Mon Sep 17 10:03:05 EDT 2007
Sven Panne <sven.panne at aedion.de> wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2007 22:06, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> > In particular, we could swap --strip back to mean
> > what it used to mean (the current --strip-c89 behaviour), and find a
> > new name for the eol-stripping flag.
> That seems to be the right way IMHO.
OK, done. The new option name is --strip-eol, and --strip-c89 is gone.
More information about the cabal-devel