cpphs and C++-style comments

[Ross Paterson]

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:38:41PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> In message <20070914171244.GA11741 at soi.city.ac.uk> libraries at haskell.org,
> cabal-devel at haskell.org writes:
> > Thanks.  Now we have a conundrum: should Cabal 1.2 use the new option,
> > and thus require the latest cpphs, or stick with the old option and be
> > broken with the new cpphs?  Cabal only invokes cpphs for non-GHC builds,
> > so I'd say use it.
> 
> Cabal knows the version of cpphs so it can use the new flag or the old one
> depending on the version of cpphs being used.

OK, so time to bump the version number of cpphs, then?