makos999 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 10:45:23 UTC 2018
I have positive experiences with regex-compat, regex-posix packages, you
can get these from hackage.
When your expression becomes more complicated it may be worth to use
parsers instead: faster processing, refactoring parsers is also easier.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:45 PM David McBride <toad3k at gmail.com> wrote:
> In Haskell virtually everyone uses parser combinator libraries like
> parsec, megaparsec, or attoparsec depending on their needs.
> Many people ask this question and are then disappointed when they can't
> find a definitively standard regex library to use. That's because they are
> barely needed.
> That's not to say that there are no such libraries
> There are. But I personally couldn't suggest any as I have not been
> compelled to use one in many years.
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, 05:38 mike h <mike_k_houghton at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> Which package is the most popular and/or easy to used for dealing with
>> regular expressions?
>> My regex is quite simple and I just need to get 2 or 3 capture groups
>> from the result.
>> Many thanks
>> Beginners mailing list
>> Beginners at haskell.org
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners at haskell.org
People seldom notice clothes, if you wear a big smile.
My grandmother uses Ubuntu, don't you think so?!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Beginners