[Haskell-beginners] Converting a data type to an abstract data type

[Ryan Warner]

> If possible, you could use a type synonym for your type which keeps
> changing. That way there would be only one place to make the change.
>
> I like the sound of this idea. I'll give it a try.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/beginners/attachments/20150917/ee4169ad/attachment.html>