[Haskell-beginners] Converting a data type to an abstract data type

[Ryan Warner]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:58 AM Kim-Ee Yeoh <ky3 at atamo.com> wrote:

>
> you could leave out signatures and let the compiler infer them for you.
> That way, there's so much you no longer need to refactor.
>
>
Thanks for pointing that out. I hadn't recognized that yet. Are type
signatures used sparingly in most Haskell code? Or as you say, is it coming
to formalize the signatures once the exploration is complete?

-Ryan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/beginners/attachments/20150917/d61f5429/attachment.html>