[arch-haskell] Re: What to do now?

[Rémy Oudompheng]

Magnus Therning <magnus at therning.org> wrote:
> Thanks.  I'll push ahead with it, despite the relative lack of
> responses so far... it's only been half a day or so though so maybe
> there'll be more comments later on.  In any case, nothing I'm doing is
> irreversible :-)
>
> Yes, I think once we have an ABS tree the same old established tools
> can be used in that tree as in other ABS trees.  I still see a use for
> cabal2arch though when it comes to keeping up with hackage, but it has
> to be changed and improved a little bit to make it fit better.

What do you mean ? cabal2arch seems to fit exactly its role, it
translates a single cabal file to a single PKGBUILD, I would rather
say the helper programs in haskell-archlinux have to be changed.

-- 
Rémy.