[arch-haskell] Creating binary and doc from the same PKGBUILD

[Magnus Therning]

Matthew William Cox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:07:35PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> I think it'd be worthwhile to provide packages with haddock-generated
>> documentation for all haskell packages.  However, I'm not convinced that
>> the docs should be packaged with the binary components of the package.
> 
> Generally, Arch users expect docs to come with the package as provided by
> upstream, and not as some separate package.
> 
> Historically Arch stripped docs out of the packages, but that policy was
> reversed over a year ago. See the hue and cry over here:
> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-April/005574.html

All right.  Then I'll instead try to modify cabal2arch to build docs as well.

The one thing that I _really_ want input on is the location of the docs

- GHC ships with docs located in /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries/
- In that directory there's also a script (gen_contents_index) that will
   rebuild the index of all haddock docs located in subdirectories (it searches
   for */*.haddock).

So, is that location an acceptable location for docs of other haskell
packages?

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org          Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/attachments/20131012/250f7726/attachment.sig>