[arch-haskell] Documentation in binary packages?
dons at galois.com
Sat Apr 17 16:26:51 EDT 2010
> I notice that haddock documentation isn't built into binary packages
> (haskell-dataenc, haskell-network, etc), while it is shipped with GHC
> itself. Furthermore, all packages built from AUR will include haddock
> documentation by default.
> Is there any reason for *not* shipping haddock documentation with all
> pre-built packages?
> At the moment this is causing me grief because haskell mode for vim
> relies on local documentation for features like "add import statement
> for identifier under the cursor", and with the current situation it
> will only find identifiers in GHC and AUR-built packages.
I think all our packages should ship with documentation (they should be
of the form generated by cabal2arch, effectively)
More information about the arch-haskell