From mestelan at gmail.com  Sat Sep  2 12:05:36 2023
From: mestelan at gmail.com (Jean-Baptiste Mestelan)
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 14:05:36 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Repeated presses on Mod - [1..9] to toggle between windows
	in workspace
Message-ID: <CAHiuU4ddJivLsHyWOSmM-Tk0F50OXEjTTQ16TNP-NRFXqdwTHQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello XMonad,

How could one extend the behaviour of Mod - [1..9], so that an initial
keypress switches to workspace n, but further keypresses toggle between
windows in that workspace?
(It is the default behaviour of groups in AutoHotKey, and I must admit it
has grown on me: it saves one move reaching for Mod-K).

Thanks for any Haskell hints.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230902/37445564/attachment.html>

From allbery.b at gmail.com  Sat Sep  2 20:11:31 2023
From: allbery.b at gmail.com (Brandon Allbery)
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 16:11:31 -0400
Subject: [xmonad] Repeated presses on Mod - [1..9] to toggle between
 windows in workspace
In-Reply-To: <CAHiuU4ddJivLsHyWOSmM-Tk0F50OXEjTTQ16TNP-NRFXqdwTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHiuU4ddJivLsHyWOSmM-Tk0F50OXEjTTQ16TNP-NRFXqdwTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKFCL4U7zqScWgMp6bkCxKX_NtpLGWNuDxo3oD-7v4edZx9e0Q@mail.gmail.com>

In place of `W.greedyView` or `W.view` you would use

`\t ss -> if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then W.focusUp ss
else W.greedyView t ss`

or define that as a function. Swap `W.greedyView` for `W.view` and/or `
W.focusDown` for `W.focusUp` if you wish.

If you define this as a function (let's say `tagOrFocus`), then the key
definition becomes (assuming `EZConfig`):

           ++
           [ (otherModMasks ++ "M-" ++ key, action tag)
           | (tag, key) <- zip workspacen (words "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - =
<F1> <F2> <F3> <F4>")
           , (otherModMasks, action) <- [("", windows . tagOrFocus)
                                        ,("S-", windows . W.shift)
                                        ]
           ]

(This is lifted from my own config, adjust as appropriate.)



On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Mestelan <mestelan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello XMonad,
>
> How could one extend the behaviour of Mod - [1..9], so that an initial
> keypress switches to workspace n, but further keypresses toggle between
> windows in that workspace?
> (It is the default behaviour of groups in AutoHotKey, and I must admit it
> has grown on me: it saves one move reaching for Mod-K).
>
> Thanks for any Haskell hints.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmonad mailing list
> xmonad at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad
>


-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh
allbery.b at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230902/a1d83ebc/attachment.html>

From mestelan at gmail.com  Sun Sep  3 06:10:36 2023
From: mestelan at gmail.com (Jean-Baptiste Mestelan)
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 08:10:36 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Repeated presses on Mod - [1..9] to toggle between
 windows in workspace
In-Reply-To: <CAKFCL4U7zqScWgMp6bkCxKX_NtpLGWNuDxo3oD-7v4edZx9e0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHiuU4ddJivLsHyWOSmM-Tk0F50OXEjTTQ16TNP-NRFXqdwTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFCL4U7zqScWgMp6bkCxKX_NtpLGWNuDxo3oD-7v4edZx9e0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHiuU4d4=Q_T5FPdkQcSYvxeHT+EoYjs=mgHfiv1jRCohdvT8Q@mail.gmail.com>

Many thanks, Brandon, this helps greatly!

I am not quite there yet: the 'move to workspace' part works OK, but the
'focus' part does not. It would seem the condition
(W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t
is never triggered? Still working on it.

I too use EZConfig, and have added the key definition as provided, along
with the function
tagOrFocus t ss = if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then
W.focusUp ss else W.view t ss

On Sat, 2 Sept 2023 at 22:11, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote:

> In place of `W.greedyView` or `W.view` you would use
>
> `\t ss -> if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then W.focusUp ss
> else W.greedyView t ss`
>
> or define that as a function. Swap `W.greedyView` for `W.view` and/or `
> W.focusDown` for `W.focusUp` if you wish.
>
> If you define this as a function (let's say `tagOrFocus`), then the key
> definition becomes (assuming `EZConfig`):
>
>            ++
>            [ (otherModMasks ++ "M-" ++ key, action tag)
>            | (tag, key) <- zip workspacen (words "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - =
> <F1> <F2> <F3> <F4>")
>            , (otherModMasks, action) <- [("", windows . tagOrFocus)
>                                         ,("S-", windows . W.shift)
>                                         ]
>            ]
>
> (This is lifted from my own config, adjust as appropriate.)
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Mestelan <mestelan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello XMonad,
>>
>> How could one extend the behaviour of Mod - [1..9], so that an initial
>> keypress switches to workspace n, but further keypresses toggle between
>> windows in that workspace?
>> (It is the default behaviour of groups in AutoHotKey, and I must admit it
>> has grown on me: it saves one move reaching for Mod-K).
>>
>> Thanks for any Haskell hints.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmonad mailing list
>> xmonad at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad
>>
>
>
> --
> brandon s allbery kf8nh
> allbery.b at gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230903/6ff2ba2c/attachment.html>

From mestelan at gmail.com  Sun Sep  3 06:37:32 2023
From: mestelan at gmail.com (Jean-Baptiste Mestelan)
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 08:37:32 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Repeated presses on Mod - [1..9] to toggle between
 windows in workspace
In-Reply-To: <CAHiuU4d4=Q_T5FPdkQcSYvxeHT+EoYjs=mgHfiv1jRCohdvT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHiuU4ddJivLsHyWOSmM-Tk0F50OXEjTTQ16TNP-NRFXqdwTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFCL4U7zqScWgMp6bkCxKX_NtpLGWNuDxo3oD-7v4edZx9e0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHiuU4d4=Q_T5FPdkQcSYvxeHT+EoYjs=mgHfiv1jRCohdvT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHiuU4cVFH+6XPLm3C9C-5_Oh=mVovVL-4rf_Kvf2Ke1GhR2=A@mail.gmail.com>

To be more precise, here is the function with its inferred type:
tagOrFocus :: (Eq i, Eq s) =>
                i -> W.StackSet i l a s sd -> W.StackSet i l a s sd
tagOrFocus t ss = if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then
W.focusUp ss else W.view t ss

On Sun, 3 Sept 2023 at 08:10, Jean-Baptiste Mestelan <mestelan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Many thanks, Brandon, this helps greatly!
>
> I am not quite there yet: the 'move to workspace' part works OK, but the
> 'focus' part does not. It would seem the condition
> (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t
> is never triggered? Still working on it.
>
> I too use EZConfig, and have added the key definition as provided, along
> with the function
> tagOrFocus t ss = if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then
> W.focusUp ss else W.view t ss
>
> On Sat, 2 Sept 2023 at 22:11, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In place of `W.greedyView` or `W.view` you would use
>>
>> `\t ss -> if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then W.focusUp ss
>> else W.greedyView t ss`
>>
>> or define that as a function. Swap `W.greedyView` for `W.view` and/or `
>> W.focusDown` for `W.focusUp` if you wish.
>>
>> If you define this as a function (let's say `tagOrFocus`), then the key
>> definition becomes (assuming `EZConfig`):
>>
>>            ++
>>            [ (otherModMasks ++ "M-" ++ key, action tag)
>>            | (tag, key) <- zip workspacen (words "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - =
>> <F1> <F2> <F3> <F4>")
>>            , (otherModMasks, action) <- [("", windows . tagOrFocus)
>>                                         ,("S-", windows . W.shift)
>>                                         ]
>>            ]
>>
>> (This is lifted from my own config, adjust as appropriate.)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Mestelan <mestelan at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello XMonad,
>>>
>>> How could one extend the behaviour of Mod - [1..9], so that an initial
>>> keypress switches to workspace n, but further keypresses toggle between
>>> windows in that workspace?
>>> (It is the default behaviour of groups in AutoHotKey, and I must admit
>>> it has grown on me: it saves one move reaching for Mod-K).
>>>
>>> Thanks for any Haskell hints.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xmonad mailing list
>>> xmonad at haskell.org
>>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> brandon s allbery kf8nh
>> allbery.b at gmail.com
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230903/2771fd08/attachment-0001.html>

From soliditsallgood at mailbox.org  Sun Sep  3 06:43:41 2023
From: soliditsallgood at mailbox.org (Tony Zorman)
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:43:41 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Repeated presses on Mod - [1..9] to toggle between
 windows in workspace
In-Reply-To: <CAHiuU4d4=Q_T5FPdkQcSYvxeHT+EoYjs=mgHfiv1jRCohdvT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHiuU4ddJivLsHyWOSmM-Tk0F50OXEjTTQ16TNP-NRFXqdwTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFCL4U7zqScWgMp6bkCxKX_NtpLGWNuDxo3oD-7v4edZx9e0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHiuU4d4=Q_T5FPdkQcSYvxeHT+EoYjs=mgHfiv1jRCohdvT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <877cp7u57m.fsf@hyperspace>

On Sun, Sep 03 2023 08:10, Jean-Baptiste Mestelan wrote:
> I am not quite there yet: the 'move to workspace' part works OK, but the
> 'focus' part does not. It would seem the condition
> (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t
> is never triggered? Still working on it.

Did you properly restart XMonad? Make sure that your config compiles; if

> tagOrFocus t ss = if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then
> W.focusUp ss else W.view t ss

is a verbatim copy, then you probably have at least one spurious line
break in there.

(For the record, I tried Brandon's solution just now and it works for
me)

-- 
Tony Zorman | https://tony-zorman.com/

From mestelan at gmail.com  Sun Sep  3 07:05:14 2023
From: mestelan at gmail.com (Jean-Baptiste Mestelan)
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 09:05:14 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Repeated presses on Mod - [1..9] to toggle between
 windows in workspace
In-Reply-To: <877cp7u57m.fsf@hyperspace>
References: <CAHiuU4ddJivLsHyWOSmM-Tk0F50OXEjTTQ16TNP-NRFXqdwTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFCL4U7zqScWgMp6bkCxKX_NtpLGWNuDxo3oD-7v4edZx9e0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHiuU4d4=Q_T5FPdkQcSYvxeHT+EoYjs=mgHfiv1jRCohdvT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <877cp7u57m.fsf@hyperspace>
Message-ID: <CAHiuU4dxD9mn4zsnsBLbviDo4uJibeDLy_v4YVYFEh0KwR9sRQ@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you, Tony, for the confirmation.

The behaviour I observe seems due to me using an azerty keyboard. I have
this line in my config:
         , keys            = azertyKeys <+> keys def

As a consequence, (words "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0") does not map to the above
row keys.

I will manually replace each digit by its azerty counterpart, unless a
smarter idea comes up.
Thank you for all the help!

On Sun, 3 Sept 2023 at 08:43, Tony Zorman <soliditsallgood at mailbox.org>
wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 03 2023 08:10, Jean-Baptiste Mestelan wrote:
> > I am not quite there yet: the 'move to workspace' part works OK, but the
> > 'focus' part does not. It would seem the condition
> > (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t
> > is never triggered? Still working on it.
>
> Did you properly restart XMonad? Make sure that your config compiles; if
>
> > tagOrFocus t ss = if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then
> > W.focusUp ss else W.view t ss
>
> is a verbatim copy, then you probably have at least one spurious line
> break in there.
>
> (For the record, I tried Brandon's solution just now and it works for
> me)
>
> --
> Tony Zorman | https://tony-zorman.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230903/105c0cd4/attachment.html>

From mestelan at gmail.com  Sun Sep  3 07:27:07 2023
From: mestelan at gmail.com (Jean-Baptiste Mestelan)
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 09:27:07 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Repeated presses on Mod - [1..9] to toggle between
 windows in workspace
In-Reply-To: <CAHiuU4dxD9mn4zsnsBLbviDo4uJibeDLy_v4YVYFEh0KwR9sRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHiuU4ddJivLsHyWOSmM-Tk0F50OXEjTTQ16TNP-NRFXqdwTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFCL4U7zqScWgMp6bkCxKX_NtpLGWNuDxo3oD-7v4edZx9e0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHiuU4d4=Q_T5FPdkQcSYvxeHT+EoYjs=mgHfiv1jRCohdvT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <877cp7u57m.fsf@hyperspace>
 <CAHiuU4dxD9mn4zsnsBLbviDo4uJibeDLy_v4YVYFEh0KwR9sRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHiuU4eW3Kf11oMEMnYZnCou704iUPB1BOR15fMg2g6Xwj4JmA@mail.gmail.com>

Confirmed working, when translated to azerty: (words "& é \" ' ( - è _ ç )")
Not the prettiest-looking config, but I can surely live with it, and the
improved functionality.
Thanks again Brandon and Tony.

On Sun, 3 Sept 2023 at 09:05, Jean-Baptiste Mestelan <mestelan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you, Tony, for the confirmation.
>
> The behaviour I observe seems due to me using an azerty keyboard. I have
> this line in my config:
>          , keys            = azertyKeys <+> keys def
>
> As a consequence, (words "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0") does not map to the above
> row keys.
>
> I will manually replace each digit by its azerty counterpart, unless a
> smarter idea comes up.
> Thank you for all the help!
>
> On Sun, 3 Sept 2023 at 08:43, Tony Zorman <soliditsallgood at mailbox.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 03 2023 08:10, Jean-Baptiste Mestelan wrote:
>> > I am not quite there yet: the 'move to workspace' part works OK, but the
>> > 'focus' part does not. It would seem the condition
>> > (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t
>> > is never triggered? Still working on it.
>>
>> Did you properly restart XMonad? Make sure that your config compiles; if
>>
>> > tagOrFocus t ss = if (W.tag . W.workspace . W.current) ss == t then
>> > W.focusUp ss else W.view t ss
>>
>> is a verbatim copy, then you probably have at least one spurious line
>> break in there.
>>
>> (For the record, I tried Brandon's solution just now and it works for
>> me)
>>
>> --
>> Tony Zorman | https://tony-zorman.com/
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230903/85b84f14/attachment.html>

From allbery.b at gmail.com  Sat Sep 16 15:36:21 2023
From: allbery.b at gmail.com (Brandon Allbery)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:36:21 -0400
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
	master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
Message-ID: <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>

Anyone know what this is about? I get it weekly, presumably because I
forked the xmonad-contrib repo.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: brandon s allbery kf8nh <notifications at github.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:14 PM
Subject: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps - master (0e2d3c1)
To: geekosaur/xmonad-contrib <xmonad-contrib at noreply.github.com>
Cc: Ci activity <ci_activity at noreply.github.com>



[image: GitHub] [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Packdeps workflow run

  Packdeps: Some jobs were not successful

View workflow run
<https://github.com/geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/actions/runs/6204953495>

[image: workflow-keepalive]

*Packdeps* / workflow-keepalive
Succeeded in 2 seconds
[image: Packdeps]

*Packdeps* / Packdeps
Failed in 3 minutes and 1 second
[image: annotations for Packdeps / Packdeps] 2
<https://github.com/geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/actions/runs/6204953495>



—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Manage your GitHub Actions notifications
<https://github.com/settings/notifications>


GitHub, Inc. ・88 Colin P Kelly Jr Street ・San Francisco, CA 94107



-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh
allbery.b at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230916/9c507ce7/attachment-0001.html>

From tomi at nomi.cz  Sat Sep 16 18:12:05 2023
From: tomi at nomi.cz (Tomas Janousek)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 19:12:05 +0100
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>

Hi,

On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:36:21AM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>Anyone know what this is about? I get it weekly, presumably because I
>forked the xmonad-contrib repo.
>[…]
>  Packdeps: Some jobs were not successful

Yeah, I keep getting it as well: https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/actions/runs/6204986546/job/16847665048

I think it's trying to tell us that our bounds exclude bytestring 0.12 
which is now available in Hackage. What we need to do is make sure 
xmonad builds and works with this version, and update the bounds.

I'm not keeping up with the Haskell ecosystem these days so I don't know 
how to actually do that. Last time I checked, bytestring was a "boot" 
package shipped with GHC, so perhaps we'd need to test with GHC HEAD? Or 
can you ask cabal to just pull it and build it?

-- 
Tomáš "liskin" ("Pivník") Janoušek, https://lisk.in/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230916/72d0b100/attachment.html>

From allbery.b at gmail.com  Sat Sep 16 18:18:19 2023
From: allbery.b at gmail.com (Brandon Allbery)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 14:18:19 -0400
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
Message-ID: <CAKFCL4UmEoNh9mKdwUHAp_h34N6DCPR-Cv1f9LYqeZMV4EJX+g@mail.gmail.com>

This has been going on for long before bytestring-0.12. I can try building
with ghc alpha but last I checked we still had other problems with it in
xmonad-contrib (https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/issues/826).

On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 2:12 PM Tomas Janousek <tomi at nomi.cz> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:36:21AM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
> Anyone know what this is about? I get it weekly, presumably because I
> forked the xmonad-contrib repo.
> […]
> Packdeps: Some jobs were not successful
>
> Yeah, I keep getting it as well:
> https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/actions/runs/6204986546/job/16847665048
>
> I think it's trying to tell us that our bounds exclude bytestring 0.12
> which is now available in Hackage. What we need to do is make sure xmonad
> builds and works with this version, and update the bounds.
>
> I'm not keeping up with the Haskell ecosystem these days so I don't know
> how to actually do that. Last time I checked, bytestring was a "boot"
> package shipped with GHC, so perhaps we'd need to test with GHC HEAD? Or
> can you ask cabal to just pull it and build it?
> --
>
> Tomáš "liskin" ("Pivník") Janoušek, https://lisk.in/
>


-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh
allbery.b at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230916/e4073d85/attachment.html>

From allbery.b at gmail.com  Sat Sep 16 18:38:01 2023
From: allbery.b at gmail.com (Brandon Allbery)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 14:38:01 -0400
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFCL4UmEoNh9mKdwUHAp_h34N6DCPR-Cv1f9LYqeZMV4EJX+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
 <CAKFCL4UmEoNh9mKdwUHAp_h34N6DCPR-Cv1f9LYqeZMV4EJX+g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKFCL4Wxi7HdXCwScPoyOvb6BydLKpcT16o==tynZV7y0bnqog@mail.gmail.com>

Also I have to wait for the final ghc alpha to drop (sometime this week
iirc) to test it, Not only because of bytestring, but because I think a
buggy release of unix was in the last one.

On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 2:18 PM Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote:

> This has been going on for long before bytestring-0.12. I can try building
> with ghc alpha but last I checked we still had other problems with it in
> xmonad-contrib (https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/issues/826).
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 2:12 PM Tomas Janousek <tomi at nomi.cz> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:36:21AM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>>
>> Anyone know what this is about? I get it weekly, presumably because I
>> forked the xmonad-contrib repo.
>> […]
>> Packdeps: Some jobs were not successful
>>
>> Yeah, I keep getting it as well:
>> https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/actions/runs/6204986546/job/16847665048
>>
>> I think it's trying to tell us that our bounds exclude bytestring 0.12
>> which is now available in Hackage. What we need to do is make sure xmonad
>> builds and works with this version, and update the bounds.
>>
>> I'm not keeping up with the Haskell ecosystem these days so I don't know
>> how to actually do that. Last time I checked, bytestring was a "boot"
>> package shipped with GHC, so perhaps we'd need to test with GHC HEAD? Or
>> can you ask cabal to just pull it and build it?
>> --
>>
>> Tomáš "liskin" ("Pivník") Janoušek, https://lisk.in/
>>
>
>
> --
> brandon s allbery kf8nh
> allbery.b at gmail.com
>


-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh
allbery.b at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230916/d065a285/attachment.html>

From soliditsallgood at mailbox.org  Sun Sep 17 10:10:00 2023
From: soliditsallgood at mailbox.org (Tony Zorman)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 12:10:00 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
Message-ID: <871qexjekn.fsf@hyperspace>

On Sat, Sep 16 2023 19:12, Tomas Janousek wrote:
>
> [… 10 lines elided …]
>
> I think it's trying to tell us that our bounds exclude bytestring 0.12 
> which is now available in Hackage. What we need to do is make sure 
> xmonad builds and works with this version, and update the bounds.
>
> I'm not keeping up with the Haskell ecosystem these days so I don't know 
> how to actually do that. Last time I checked, bytestring was a "boot" 
> package shipped with GHC, so perhaps we'd need to test with GHC HEAD? Or 
> can you ask cabal to just pull it and build it?

It is a boot library, but even GHC HEAD is only shipping with 0.11.4.0
currently[1], so I think it's fine to ignore this particular warning for
now. I also wish one could disable it somehow, though.

[1]: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/commentary/libraries/version-history

-- 
Tony Zorman | https://tony-zorman.com/

From mail at joachim-breitner.de  Sun Sep 17 18:19:22 2023
From: mail at joachim-breitner.de (Joachim Breitner)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 20:19:22 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
Message-ID: <a98a3bc32f81b397674c5e5f1a400257f477ab69.camel@joachim-breitner.de>

Hi,

Am Samstag, dem 16.09.2023 um 19:12 +0100 schrieb Tomas Janousek:
> Or can you ask cabal to just pull it and build it?

you can! As long as you don’t depend on the “ghc” library (which is the
only library cabal cannot just rebuild, AFAIK).

Cheers,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de
  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/


From allbery.b at gmail.com  Sun Sep 17 18:27:43 2023
From: allbery.b at gmail.com (Brandon Allbery)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:27:43 -0400
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <a98a3bc32f81b397674c5e5f1a400257f477ab69.camel@joachim-breitner.de>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
 <a98a3bc32f81b397674c5e5f1a400257f477ab69.camel@joachim-breitner.de>
Message-ID: <CAKFCL4Wq+rLaczU_h-cFX61+9=YPtopHtByD9DCyJx5Y_D=VBA@mail.gmail.com>

Actually there's four: `base`, `ghc`, `template-haskell`, `ghc-prim`.
Everything else is fair game, although you may need to be explicit about it
because cabal will prefer the installed version.

On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 2:19 PM Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, dem 16.09.2023 um 19:12 +0100 schrieb Tomas Janousek:
> > Or can you ask cabal to just pull it and build it?
>
> you can! As long as you don’t depend on the “ghc” library (which is the
> only library cabal cannot just rebuild, AFAIK).
>
> Cheers,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de
>   http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmonad mailing list
> xmonad at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad
>


-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh
allbery.b at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230917/d6c02423/attachment.html>

From soliditsallgood at mailbox.org  Mon Sep 18 05:07:44 2023
From: soliditsallgood at mailbox.org (Tony Zorman)
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 07:07:44 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <a98a3bc32f81b397674c5e5f1a400257f477ab69.camel@joachim-breitner.de>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
 <a98a3bc32f81b397674c5e5f1a400257f477ab69.camel@joachim-breitner.de>
Message-ID: <87y1h4hxwf.fsf@hyperspace>

On Sun, Sep 17 2023 20:19, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 16.09.2023 um 19:12 +0100 schrieb Tomas Janousek:
>> Or can you ask cabal to just pull it and build it?
>
> you can! As long as you don’t depend on the “ghc” library (which is the
> only library cabal cannot just rebuild, AFAIK).

Oh, that's good to know; thanks! I was successful with

    cabal build --constraint="bytestring ==0.12.0.2"

so I guess we can also just bump the `bytestring' dependency.

  Tony

-- 
Tony Zorman | https://tony-zorman.com/

From tomi at nomi.cz  Mon Sep 18 09:07:01 2023
From: tomi at nomi.cz (Tomas Janousek)
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:07:01 +0100
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <87y1h4hxwf.fsf@hyperspace>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
 <a98a3bc32f81b397674c5e5f1a400257f477ab69.camel@joachim-breitner.de>
 <87y1h4hxwf.fsf@hyperspace>
Message-ID: <ZQgTNTjNFJcxaOAJ@nomi.cz>

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 07:07:44AM +0200, Tony Zorman wrote:
>Oh, that's good to know; thanks! I was successful with
>
>    cabal build --constraint="bytestring ==0.12.0.2"
>
>so I guess we can also just bump the `bytestring' dependency.

Let's do this then. Ideally this should be tested by the CI but it's not 
worth the effort—it will eventually be tested when bytestring 0.12 ships 
with a version of GHC that we add to the Matrix. And it's unlikely we'll 
break compatibility in the meantime.

-- 
Tomáš "liskin" ("Pivník") Janoušek, https://lisk.in/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20230918/ab56cd4d/attachment.html>

From mail at joachim-breitner.de  Thu Sep 21 10:21:04 2023
From: mail at joachim-breitner.de (Joachim Breitner)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 12:21:04 +0200
Subject: [xmonad] Fwd: [geekosaur/xmonad-contrib] Run failed: Packdeps -
 master (0e2d3c1)
In-Reply-To: <ZQgTNTjNFJcxaOAJ@nomi.cz>
References: <geekosaur/xmonad-contrib/check-suites/CS_kwDOFKxMq88AAAADx15wNw/1694834033@github.com>
 <CAKFCL4U_eDuCp4njFbigE8dmOpKB8tc3+k7BhCD8EemGSHJWoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQXv9f5OE42Xc1NA@nomi.cz>
 <a98a3bc32f81b397674c5e5f1a400257f477ab69.camel@joachim-breitner.de>
 <87y1h4hxwf.fsf@hyperspace> <ZQgTNTjNFJcxaOAJ@nomi.cz>
Message-ID: <9aa8f35012839698096c0fa80958b4db2e51967f.camel@joachim-breitner.de>

Hi,

Am Montag, dem 18.09.2023 um 10:07 +0100 schrieb Tomas Janousek:
> Hi,
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 07:07:44AM +0200, Tony Zorman wrote:
> > Oh, that's good to know; thanks! I was successful with
> > cabal build --constraint="bytestring ==0.12.0.2"
> > so I guess we can also just bump the `bytestring' dependency.
> Let's do this then. Ideally this should be tested by the CI

See https://github.com/haskell-CI/haskell-ci/issues/667 if you care
about this. I built https://github.com/nomeata/cabal-force-upper-bound
so that on can make a CI matrix that exercises the upper bounds, but it
hasn’t been integrated into haskell-ci so far.

Cheers,
Joachim



-- 
Joachim Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de
  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/