[xmonad] upstream version

Alexander Genaud alex at genaud.net
Mon Mar 2 11:50:47 UTC 2015


I'm sorry for botching up the thread subject.

What holds up official releases, then? It seems to me, the state of Linux
DE's has changed significantly since 2012. Xmonad 0.11 doesn't seem to play
nice straight 'out of the box' on fresh installations of the latest,
largest distributions.



On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Tamas Papp <tkpapp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "Bleeding edge" can be a concern if it has implications on for bugs that
> affect user experience. I don't know if it is Haskell or the skills of
> the xmonad team (probably both), but I have always used the latest
> xmonad and found it remarkably bug-free. In fact, I would find it
> difficult to name any other piece of nontrivial software that has a
> similar level of stability.
>
> Best,
>
> Tamas
>
> On Mon, Mar 02 2015, Alexander Genaud <alex at genaud.net> wrote:
>
> > Or, if x.x.B already has meaning (bugfix release), then rc (release
> > candidate) notation would serve a similar purpose:
> >
> > 0.12.5-rc1 ==> 0.12.5 (bugfix release)
> > 0.13-rc1 ==> 0.13 (major/minor release)
> >
> > I think the difference is EVERY Java release must be a supported
standard
> > target. Xmonad has local, but no global, critical child dependencies.
One
> > would never recommend that a general user compiles bleeding edge Javac
for
> > any real work -- yet that's what some Xmonad-ers have recommended for
two
> > years.
> >
> > If 0.12.3 exists, but is not considered stable, then 0.12-rc3 or 0.12b3
> > would seem more appropriate.
> >
> >> Oh, yes.. i didn't check the page. I've been too much in the java
> >> world using the snapshot descriptor, it would be cool if we had such a
> >> thing in xmonad in where 0.12 would be release notation for example
> >> and 0.12.5 would be upstream notation, and a preparation for 0.13.
> >> 0.12.5 is released as 0.13 and the darcs version is updated to 0.13.5
> >> and so forth.. I attach the patches in case this resonates with you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20150302/a280d18d/attachment.html>


More information about the xmonad mailing list